Last night’s MARTA meeting covered the proposed Beltline and C-Loop plans - the so-called Inner Core. After a lengthy, painful presentation, there was a Q&A session of sorts - during which some good questions were posed, and no real answers were given.
When one guy asked if MARTA had taken into consideration the costs of different sources of power - especially considering how natural gas is projected to skyrocket in the coming months, and of course the usual concerns about oil - when deciding on what types of rapid transit to implement, the consultants’ reaction seemed to be one of, “Hmm, we hadn’t thought of that!” I could be wrong, of course. But the question was quickly brushed aside, which I found strange, since I think it’s one of the most important issues. Seems to me that electric power is a no-brainer; it is viable over the long-term and relatively cheap to maintain once the infrastructure is put into place. One need only look at the 100-year-old New York City subway for evidence. Of course, this requires long-term thinking, and that’s an area where I’m not so confident with MARTA.
Moving on… Correct me if I’m wrong, but it’s my undertanding that the Beltline Parternship is independent, but has chosen MARTA to be in charge of implementation. I’m still unclear about how this would affect fare structure; I assume (and this assumption was reinforced last night) that if things proceed as they are now, the Beltline rail will be a part of the MARTA system. However, someone asked the question last night, what if that doesn’t end up being the case? I don’t think bringing another player onto the field would necessarily be the best strategy - it would just introduce more confusion and [potentially] frustration. Would people have to pay separate fares? I know that’s how it currently works with CCT for example; but to me that’s different, since CCT is an OTP system that operates mainly in Cobb, and also serves to bring people into the city - but not transport them around once they’re here.
Having several independent systems all operating in the same city just seems like a bad idea, and one that will ultimately result in consolidation. Just look at New York (again) - there used to be the Manhattan Railway, IRT, BMT, and IND, but they were finally consolidated under the New York City Transit Authority (now MTA) in 1953.
I understand about capitalism, competition, and all that jazz - but it just seems that in such a situation, consolidation is something that’s bound to happen anyway, so why waste taxpayers’ money and time playing around with other kludgy “solutions”?
Perhaps the highlight of the night was watching a bit of vehement back-and-forth between a 90-year-old man and an 18-year-old whippersnapper; for a minute there I thought it might come to fisticuffs. I disagreed with pretty much everything the old man said (regarding cars being “the only vehicle that can get you from point A to point B”); but I’ll write more about that later, since this is long enough already.
However, I would like to point out the great irony that access to the meeting was definitely car-biased. The entrance was tucked away in the back of a parking garage. So those of us who took MARTA to the MARTA meeting wandered around like idiots for a while before a cop pointed us in the right direction.
[Cross posted, with more rambling, at Being Amber Rhea]